ERI™ shows where operating records disagree, captures management's explanation, keeps GGI's assessment separate, and carries owners, evidence and progress forward.
ERI™ reconciles records created for different purposes and keeps what each source supports, what management explains, what GGI assesses and what remains open.
Define the scope, population, period and source roles behind what management represents.
Surface gaps and differences that need explanation, kept separate from confirmed contradictions.
Carry the finding, explanation, assessment, owner, evidence, status and movement forward.
The platform structures the record. Management, specialists and GGI make the judgments.
Define the entity, population, period, obligation, decision context and evidence sources relevant to the review.
Organize what the provided records support and identify evidence gaps or candidate conflicts.
Capture definitions, context, operating intent, decisions, disputed facts and internal ownership.
Apply independent operating judgment to significance, institutional relevance, action and escalation.
Maintain ownership, evidence, remediation status, review history and movement over time.
Steps 1–2 Surface · Steps 3–4 Resolve · Step 5 Close
Organizes evidence, compares records, surfaces possible exceptions and maintains the governed record.
Explains factual and contextual meaning, confirms or disputes observations, and attests to decisions and ownership.
Apply professional judgment within legal, tax, financial, cyber, HR, audit and other defined scopes.
Independently assesses significance and manages the cross-functional remediation program.
Records can describe different populations, dates, entities or purposes. Comparability is established before a difference becomes a contradiction.
A record's weight depends on the assertion, period and decision at hand.
ERI records what was provided, what was assessed and what remains open.
Context is essential. GGI keeps independent judgment over significance, remediation and readiness.
The record can hold disputed facts, qualified conclusions and open items.
A finding keeps an owner, action, supporting evidence, review history and a clear basis for closure or renewed review.
ERI strengthens institutional reliance by making the operating record explainable, preserving source context, and keeping accountable people in the judgment chain.
ERI organizes the operating assertions and dependencies that QoE, legal, tax, commercial, cyber, HR, audit and other specialists rely upon.
GGI provides operating judgment and program management while accountable people determine significance, required action and closure.
The record shows what each source supports, where context is required, and what remains open for explanation or assessment.
Machine-assisted processing surfaces candidate gaps. Management explains context. GGI independently assesses significance.
The record separates provided evidence, unassessed evidence, unsupported assertions, candidate conflicts and confirmed findings.
Evidence, explanation, assessment, ownership, action and closure basis remain connected for accountable review.
Quality of Earnings tests the financial earnings story. Specialist diligence evaluates risks within defined professional scopes. ERI™, the Exit Readiness Index™, reconciles the operating assertions and dependencies those workstreams rely upon, identifies where records and management representations diverge, and preserves the finding history over time. GGI applies independent judgment and coordinates the operating leadership required to move material findings toward verified closure.
The workflow executes against the record. The record governs the workflow.
An introductory ERI briefing can focus on the operating question, decision context and scope. Detailed evidence and environment-specific analysis can follow under agreed confidentiality.
Request an ERI™ briefing →